It’s just about the end of week one of this “unemployment” business. I can tell the days are just going to blend together and that there is no such thing as “hump day” in my new world. Even my young son said to me on Monday morning as I was dropping him off at school, “Mommy – we don’t have to rush out of the car”. Right. My sentiment exactly. Mommy doesn’t have a job! Of course I silently replied to him, as I am quite sure that he has not mentally registered that Mommy seems to be around the house MUCH more now. Or that Mommy seems to be wearing her pajamas all day.
Which gets me to the point about our apparel diet? Are we allowed to purchase new pj’s? Is this part of the “new underwear” clause? If underwear is an approved purchase over this year long haul, are night-night clothes okay too? Of course if this is allowed, I will be sure to head straight to TARGET and avoid J.Crew at all costs.
TARGET – Affordable and fashionable. And at this point, the former descriptive is all I care about.
Loading ...
Would LOVE new jammies!!!
jammies are included on the diet, sorry.
big bummer – I am going to have to find a PJ sponsor or donor…..
First, I’ll say that learned about this project in the Seattle Times last week and I think GAAD is a great idea! You’re inspiring me to think about my relationship with clothes and how I shop and for that, thank you!!
Second, instead of buying more pajamas, I think it’s a good idea to get dressed each day.
I think it’s really important, maybe especially important to get dressed and feel good about yourself when you’re at home and “not working.” (maybe you don’t have a paying job at the moment, but you most certainly are working).
Thanks again for your inspiration!